Welcome to Dirteam.com/ActiveDir.org Blogs Sign in | Join | Help
 
 
On Active Directory and everything Active Directory related...
in Search

YusufJoosub

Philosophy on operations Management

Numerous discussions and questions after presentations have led me to ponder the title of this post. Namely the request of customers asking “How does Microsoft do it?”. Well, that’s the thing, it’s a philosophy that make sense and begins to become easier once it is put into practice and adhered to. Operations management not just in the Wintel space, but across platforms is big business. We at Microsoft adhere to the concept of the Dynamic Systems Initiative which is a vision for what an agile business should look like (see here for more). But that is from a technology management perspective, and as you know changing process on a system is easier than changing the habits of an individual.

 

IT agility to meet the needs of business to become adaptable is a journey. IT needs to continuously improve and not remain stagnant. Everyone in the industry knows that we operate at a dizzying speed; constantly learning and trying to improve our knowledge of the plethora of technologies available. But how do we translate that to a value that business can reap? How do we take what we have learnt and go to business with something that will enable business? We have used IO (see here for more) to assess your environment and provide guidance and try to underline what needs to change to become better whether it be People, process or even technology. But sometimes this change is not as easily accepted as we would like. People, by nature, are habitual and sometimes change is not a fluid process.

 

Organizations have invested in staff to become ITIL certified and even Microsoft has Microsoft Operations Framework (see here for more). Operations is not a not a new phenomenon and neither is getting the most out of your investment. But the difficult to attain is the “how”. How do we manage? How do we cut costs without retarding our agility? How do we balance what we are spending with the value we are showing? I believe that continuous improvement in management across platforms, systems and teams is needed. Continuous improvement is as much a mindset as anything else. It is the acceptance of the idea that improving the delivery of an IT service or services is not something that is performed once and is then forgotten, but is instead an ongoing process.

 

Continuous improvement, then, is the ongoing process of taking advantage of successes, actively building on them, and adding necessary service and business-impacting improvements.

 

In responding to a growing dependency on their services and the expectation that they should do more with less, many successful IT departments have shifted from just operating the IT infrastructure towards providing solutions and services that are more directly linked to providing business value.

 

In essence, they have moved toward a business-needs–focused service management orientation. An essential component of a service management orientation is the concept of a managed services portfolio, which, in its simplest form, is the recognition that IT service providers are responsible for providing a catalogue of IT services. Some of these business-supporting services are delivered using service level agreements (SLAs), while others are component services that support the business service itself.

 

The benefits of organizing around services rather than technology include:

 

        Cost efficiency

 

        Quality assurance

 

        Compliance enablement

 

 

Given the pace of change in IT and business, consistently achieving these benefits requires an approach that is clearly not a one-time effort, but rather something that is ongoing—in other words, continuous improvement.

 

To be successful, continuous improvement requires a philosophical change: a change in mindset that leads to changes in how day-to-day work is done. It requires an environment that encourages proactive improvement of a managed service portfolio and the IT customer experience, one that is framed in business value and business benefit, and which considers the requirements of market regularity and the business needs regarding compliance and governance. Success at continuous improvement requires consideration of not just the technology, but also the people and processes that make up IT services.

 

These are my thoughts on operations management and am more than happy to discuss this further should you want Microsoft to provide assistance in reaching a state of Nirvana or close enough ;-). Difficult I know and probably a painful exercise. But I am sure will be worthwhile in the end.

 

Many thanks and kind regards,

Yusuf

Published Tuesday, June 17, 2008 4:10 AM by YusufJoosub

Comments

 

carlos said:

Excellent post, I think many share your view on this however few know how to execute on that view.

Carlos

June 17, 2008 4:55 AM
 

YusufJoosub said:

well, thats the thing... the execution. and unlike installing and operating a server, teh management thereof is a growing process; somethign that requires dilligence and thought. Its an ongoing process of learning and adapting.

June 17, 2008 5:53 AM
 

Sander Berkouwer said:

Yusuf,

I wholeheartedly agree with the change of mindset that's required throughout an entire organization. Whether these changes originate bottom-up or top-down I feel Microsoft provides tools to accomplish this change. I feel MOF, BPIO and MDOP are perfect examples.

Unfortunately environments still exist where system administrators are constantly putting out fires without (the possibility of) thinking how things might be done in a smarter way, (the ability of) having a say in strategic planning and/or (the knowledge of) using the tools available and where (interim) managers are occupied with gathering money in the short term. The initial investment might not be overcome, which is too bad. In the long run more things might get done smarter, with less.

I feel Windows Vista and Server Core are pieces of technology allowing organizations to gain benefits, that weren't available in previous versions of Windows. I feel Bitlocker Drive Encryption and Windows Imaging are both perfect examples of real-world business problem solvers.

Unfortunately I also feel the low adoption rates of Windows Vista are an indication of the rate of businesses that understand how to manage operations. Not seeing or not being able to communicate the benefits of Windows Vista might be the clearest indicator your business is contained in an old mindset.

June 17, 2008 8:05 AM
 

YusufJoosub said:

Sander, you are so right... I got into a discussion a few weeks ago with a customer on the management of the Mainframe environment vs. Wintel. What was interesting to note was that since its inception mainframe admins and operators did everything as per the manual. No cowboy tactics. Documentatio was unheard of in the Microsoft space. We had best practices for implementations but hardly nothing for operations management. I am talking a while ago, like before NT3.51. So we were late in producing appropirate management and maintenance guidance to our customer base. MOM only came out in the need for us to manage the environment because everything was manual hardly any automation.

What I would like to see is an Operations Management exam as part of the MCSE to begin with. Get technologists thinking before acting. This was, we can ensure that the next "Wave" of MCSE's are not just qualifies but capable in managing and operating the environments.

Jsut a thought... thoughts are free ;-)

June 18, 2008 2:00 AM
 

Sander Berkouwer said:

Actually, exam 70-400 (Microsoft System Center Operations Manager 2007, Configuring) may serve as the elective exam for both MCSA 2003 and MCSE 2003 certifications, so people are able nowadays to complement their certification with Operations Management knowledge, based on MOM and/or SCOM.

It will take a change in mindset however to understand the value of these MCSE certified people. People with technology (or product) oriented electives, like messaging (Microsoft Exchange Server, 70-224, 70-284 or 70-236), databases (Microsoft SQL Server, 70-431) or security (Microsoft ISA Server, 70-227, 70-350) are still considered to be better, faster stronger (more knowledgeable and more valuable) until the Operations Management philosophy trickles through.

Unfortunately Microsoft's certification strategy has changed considerably in the last few months, touting MCITP certifications as successors to the MCSA and MCSE certifications. Tackling the problem of widely varying MCSA and MCSE certifications the exams for the MCITP are set. Varying can now be done by collecting MCTS (Technology Specialist) certifications.
(collect them all!)

While this change brings clarity and comparison to Microsoft certifications, it might have a negative impact on the adoption of Operations Management philosophy. Concentrating on the biggest certifications around (MCSE nowadays, MCITP Enterprise Admin in the future) in my opinion will hinder this adoption in Microsoft's new certification strategy. People with a Technology Specialism (MCTS) in SCOM might not be appreciated as such...

June 22, 2008 9:12 AM
 

TrackBack said:

Techlog.org, one of DirTeam affiliates just linked back to this post.

June 22, 2008 9:38 AM
 

TrackBack said:

Walter Chomak, Sr. Consultant, Microsoft MCS, just linked back to this post from his Windows Live Space.
June 24, 2008 1:53 AM
Anonymous comments are disabled

This Blog

Syndication

Tags

No tags have been created or used yet.

Archives

Powered by Community Server (Personal Edition), by Telligent Systems